BlueHost Vs FatCow, In-Depth Shared Web Hosting Comparison

BlueHost Vs FatCow, In-Depth Shared Web Hosting Comparison

0 813

bluehost vs fatcow

An Independent Comparison about
Bluehost Vs FatCow:

According to our editors’ independent research and view-points, as well as our site readers’ feedbacks and reviews, Bluehost is much better than FatCow web service. This comparison article is based on the hosting features, performance, reliability, pricing, technical support and customer service, also with the reputation of the 2 web hosts in the industry.

If you’re not familiar with the 2 famous web hosts, let’s bring you a brief introduction first.

An Introduction of Bluehost:

Bluehost is a leading provider who has been focusing on Linux-based web hosting service for personal users, individuals and small businesses since 1996. As one of the world largest, historical and most famous web hosting providers, Bluehost has set a good example for other web hosts to learn. Bluehost is the first web host offering a single all-in-one web hosting plan to customers world-wide.

As for the newest statistics, Bluehost is already offering service to over 2 million website owners in over 180 countries. Unlike many other web hosts that aways need to rent data centers, Bluehost operates its own 3 world-class data centers which are located in Utah, USA.

Bluehost always offered only a single all-in-one shared hosting plan to consumers before, and now they’re also providing reseller hosting and dedicated server solutions to medium-sized businesses and advanced enterprises.

An Introduction of FatCow:

FatCow is another historical web host that has been offering Linux-based web service to consumers over a decade. The company also offers a single, but powerful all-in-one shared hosting package to personal sites, blogs and small businesses.

Founded in 1997 and headquartered in Burlington, MA, FatCow had received a fast growth in the first few years of company established, but the pace of their growth was stopped in recent years since it was acquired by EIG.

To be honest, we always recommended FatCow to developers, programmers and our site readers in the previous time, but not for now. If you’d like to select a better web host between Bluehost and FatCow, we do recommend you may check with Bluehost first.

Bluehost Rating:

bluehost vs fatcow

Bluehost – Best Small Business Hosting

  • Reputation
    rating 5 of 5
  • Features
    rating 5 of 5
  • Performance
    rating 4.5 of 5
  • Reliability
    rating 4.5 of 5
  • Support
    rating 5 of 5
  • Price
    rating 5 of 5
    $4.95/mo, 20% off $6.95/mo regularly

FatCow Rating:

fatcow vs bluehost

FatCow – Not Recommended!

  • Reputation
    rating 4 of 5
  • Features
    rating 3.5 of 5
  • Performance
    rating 4 of 5
  • Reliability
    rating 3 of 5
  • Support
    rating 4 of 5
  • Price
    rating 5 of 5
    $3.67/mo, 40% off $6.99/mo regularly

A Comparison of Web Hosting Features Between Bluehost and FatCow:

Both of the web hosts are offering a sing all-in-one shared hosting package to consumers and most of their web hosting features are very similar, such as both of them offer unlimited disk space, unlimited bandwidth, hosted unlimited websites, script auto-installer and a free domain name registration, etc. But it does have a few differences, e.g., Bluehost is using cPanel, and FatCow is offering vDeck control panel to their clients.

You can check a detail web hosting comparison about their web hosting features as below.

FEATURES ixwebhosting bluehost arvixe
Hosting Plan 1 1 2
Pricing $3.95/Mo $3.67/Mo $2.80/Mo
Disk Space Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Data Transfer Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Hosted Websites Unlimited Unlimited 6
CGI / Perl Perl Perl Perl
Ruby on Rails (ROR) Ruby on Rails Ruby on Rails Ruby on Rails
FFmpeg FFmpeg FFmpeg FFmpeg
MySQL Databases Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Dedicated IP N/A N/A $2/mo
PostgreSQL PostgreSQL PostgreSQL PostgreSQL
Cron Jobs Cron Jobs Cron Jobs Cron Jobs
Tomcat Servlet Tomcat Servlet Tomcat Servlet Tomcat Servlet
ASP.Net 4.5 Framework MS Access MS Access MS Access
Redundant Network 10 GB/sec 10 GB/sec 100 GB/sec
Backups Daily Daily Nightly
Free Website Migration Free Website Migration Free Website Migration Free Website Migration
Minimum RAM 16 GB 8 GB 24 GB
Marketing Credits $100 $150 $175
Script Auto-Installer Script Auto-Installer Script Auto-Installer Script Auto-Installer
Control Panel cPanel vDeck cPanel / dotnetPanel
Available OS Linux OS Linux OS Linux CentOS &
Javascript Javascript Javascript Javascript
CloudFlare CDN CloudFlare CDN CloudFlare CDN CloudFlare CDN
24×7 Support 24x7 Support 24x7 Support 24x7 Support
Money Back Anytime 30 Days 60 Days
Click Here >> Click Here >> Click Here >>

Since Arvixe is awarded as best web hosting provider on our review site, our editors determined to add the company into the total comparison with Bluehost and FatCow. As you see, Arvixe’s hosting price is much cheaper than Bluehost and FatCow, and it also offers much more features on their hosting packages and that’s why the company is named as best web host at here.

A Comparison of Web Hosting Performance Between Bluehost and FatCow:

The performance of a provider is always the first of most important criteria for us to choose a best web host at our reviews. Which web host is offering better web performance between Bluehost and FatCow? In order to receive a more sensible consequence, our editors have opened 2 accounts with the two hosting firms to test personally. We’ve installed many script applications such as WordPress, PrestaShop, Magento Commerce, Joomla and several other popular softwares on the 2 companies, finally we discover those script are running smarter and more fluently on Bluehost. As Bluehost is using cPanel control panel, we can install those popular applications easily with 1-click auto-installer in our hosting account.

As a leader and experienced web hosting service provider, Bluehost knows better about the site speed and uptime which are critical for a business website. They’ve installed millions of US-dollars to update all of their infrastructure and networks to the latest hardware, and they’ve made many other great efforts to improve their web hosting performance, such as:

  • Bluehost has invested over 25 million USD to set up 3 world-class data centers meet with strictest criteria.
  • Over 10,000 Dell Poweredge Servers with at least Dual-Core Intel Processor.
  • All of the data centers are featuring fire protection system, earthquake resistant structure, redundant UPS, flood protection and generator backup, etc.
  • Self-developed CPU virtulization that can inteligently assign server resources to each account to prevent any server abusing by your neighbours.
  • Bluehost adopts UPS power supply and diesel generator backup power to ensure your websites are always online.
  • 6 separated phisical fiber lines with multiple 100 Gigabit Ethernet access.
  • Their data centers and infrastructure are monitored by server administrators around the clock.

bluehost and fatcow speed

As you see, the web hosting performance of FatCow is not so great as Bluehost, the average server response time of FatCow is about 680ms which is much slower than Bluehost (310ms). The comparison is from the speed test of WordPress site proofs positive that Bluehost is a better choice for blog sites.

Technical Support and Customer Service:

Both Bluehost and FatCow offer 24×7 technical support and customer service through live chat, toll-free phone call and Email. Bluehost guarantees with an average holding time on phone call should be less than 30 seconds and the average response time in a ticket should be less than 15 minutes, but FatCow promises the average response time on a new phone call should be less than 2 minutes and the average response time in a ticket should be within 24 hours.

Based on our editors’ years of experience in dealing business with Bluehost and FatCow, both of the 2 web hosts are responsive in customer support service, but Bluehost is doing better in providing efficient assistance to clients. If you don’t believe with what we review here, just feel free to contact their online live chat operators to compare yourself and you’ll find what we’ve said is absolutely true.

The Resources of Bluehost and FatCow Comparison:

  • Bluehost reviews – You can visit here to check real user reviews about Bluehost web hosting service.
  • FatCow reviews – Planning to find more information about FatCow? Just click here to check more details about FatCow?
  • Bluehost Promotion – If you’ve determined to open a new hosting account with Bluehost, you can visit this page to activate the promotional link to receive a discounted price.

Is there a web host who’s better than both Bluehost and FatCow?

To be honest, it’s real hard to find a web host that’s better than Bluehost, but it’s real easy to find a provider which is better than FatCow. At our review site, we only promote and recommend the reliable web hosts to web designers, programmers and our honest readers. If you don’t want to choose Bluehost or FatCow as your web hosting provider, here we highly recommend you may check with Arvixe web solutions first – The company has won the highest customer satisfaction from our site visitors’ feedbacks and rates.


To choose a best web host is always a terrific job to most of the webmasters, but everything becomes simple at here. All of our editors are having at least five years of experience in reviewing web hosting companies in the industry and if you’re having any doubts or encountering difficulty in choosing a right web host for your website or a unique script application, please feel free to contact us anytime as you like, we promise to reply you back as soon as we can.


Leave a Reply